10_28

media type="custom" key="4687869"

First theorem's proof is merely transcribed. It should contain more details as well as full sentences. The second one's statement is incomplete, as well as the proof (not all the reasons have been listed). Even though we weren't going to prove 3.15, 16 .. the statements should have been given for completeness. Dedekind's axiom isn't quite the converse of LSP. And did you really mean 1/(2n)?